Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)
Library,Documentation and Information Science Division

“A research journal serves that narrow

borderland which separates the known from the unknown”

-P.C.Mahalanobis


Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Charter conflicts [electronic resource] : what is Parliament's role? / Janet L. Hiebert.

By: Hiebert, Janet, 1960-.
Material type: TextTextPublisher: Montreal [Que.] : McGill-Queen's University Press, c2002Description: 1 online resource (xviii, 285 p.).ISBN: 0773523995 (bound); 9780773523999 (bound); 0773524088 (pbk.); 9780773524088 (pbk.); 9780773570375 (electronic bk.); 0773570373 (electronic bk.).Subject(s): Canada. Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms | Civil rights -- Canada | Legislative power -- Canada | Canada. Charte canadienne des droits et libert�es | Droits de l'homme -- Canada | Pouvoir l�egislatif -- Canada | Parlementen | Grondwetten | Grondrechten | Charter of rights and freedoms | Parlament | Gesetzgebende Gewalt | Kanada | LAW / Constitutional | LAW / PublicGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Charter conflicts.DDC classification: 342.71/085 Online resources: EBSCOhost
Contents:
Political scrutiny of Charter conflicts -- The legitimacy debate -- A relational approach to Charter judgments -- Tobacco advertising -- sexual assault trials -- Regulating the collection and uses of DNA -- The rules and exemptions for search warrants -- Equality claims of Lesbians and Gay Men -- Assessing the Charter's influence.
Review: "Although the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is twenty years old, little is known about how it affects those who wield power, what influence it has on legislative decision, or to what extent the government believes it should be constrained by Charter concerns. For most laws Parliament has the final word on how social policy is balanced against protected rights. Thus the extent to which legislation is sensitive towards rights depends on how those who develop, propose, and assess policy view the Charter. How influential are governmental legal advisers? How risk-averse or risk-tolerant are government ministers when pursuing legislative goals that may result in Charter challenges? How capable is Parliament in requiring government to justify and explain legislative choices that may impair rights?" "In Charter Conflicts Janet Hiebert examines these questions while analysing the Charter's influence on controversial legislative decisions such as social benefits for lesbians and gay men, the regulation of tobacco advertising, the rules of evidence for sexual assault trials, the use of DNA for law-enforcement purposes, and the rules for police searches of private residences. She questions the broadly held assumption that only courts are capable of respecting rights, arguing that Parliament shares responsibility with the judiciary for resolving Charter conflicts. She views the Charter's significance less in terms of the judiciary overruling Parliament than in the incentives and pressures it provides for public and political officials to satisfy themselves that legislation is consistent with protected rights."--BOOK JACKET.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Includes bibliographical references and index.

Description based on print version record.

Political scrutiny of Charter conflicts -- The legitimacy debate -- A relational approach to Charter judgments -- Tobacco advertising -- sexual assault trials -- Regulating the collection and uses of DNA -- The rules and exemptions for search warrants -- Equality claims of Lesbians and Gay Men -- Assessing the Charter's influence.

"Although the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is twenty years old, little is known about how it affects those who wield power, what influence it has on legislative decision, or to what extent the government believes it should be constrained by Charter concerns. For most laws Parliament has the final word on how social policy is balanced against protected rights. Thus the extent to which legislation is sensitive towards rights depends on how those who develop, propose, and assess policy view the Charter. How influential are governmental legal advisers? How risk-averse or risk-tolerant are government ministers when pursuing legislative goals that may result in Charter challenges? How capable is Parliament in requiring government to justify and explain legislative choices that may impair rights?" "In Charter Conflicts Janet Hiebert examines these questions while analysing the Charter's influence on controversial legislative decisions such as social benefits for lesbians and gay men, the regulation of tobacco advertising, the rules of evidence for sexual assault trials, the use of DNA for law-enforcement purposes, and the rules for police searches of private residences. She questions the broadly held assumption that only courts are capable of respecting rights, arguing that Parliament shares responsibility with the judiciary for resolving Charter conflicts. She views the Charter's significance less in terms of the judiciary overruling Parliament than in the incentives and pressures it provides for public and political officials to satisfy themselves that legislation is consistent with protected rights."--BOOK JACKET.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Other editions of this work

Charter conflicts by Hiebert, Janet, ©2002
Charter conflicts by Hiebert, Janet, ©2002
Library, Documentation and Information Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B T Road, Kolkata 700108, INDIA
Phone no. 91-33-2575 2100, Fax no. 91-33-2578 1412, ksatpathy@isical.ac.in


Visitor Counter