Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC)
Library,Documentation and Information Science Division

“A research journal serves that narrow

borderland which separates the known from the unknown”

-P.C.Mahalanobis


Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Airbase vulnerability to conventional cruise-missile and ballistic-missile attacks [electronic resource] : technology, scenarios, and U.S. Air Force responses / John Stillion and David T. Orletsky.

By: Stillion, John.
Contributor(s): Orletsky, David T, 1963- | United States. Air Force | Project Air Force (U.S.).
Material type: TextTextPublisher: Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1999Description: 1 online resource (xxiii, 96 p.) : ill.ISBN: 0585225362 (electronic bk.); 9780585225364 (electronic bk.); 9780833027009; 083302700X.Subject(s): Air bases -- Security measures -- United States | Cruise missile defenses -- United States | Ballistic missile defenses -- United States | United States. Air Force -- Security measures | TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING -- Military Science | Electronic booksGenre/Form: Electronic books.Additional physical formats: Print version:: Airbase vulnerability to conventional cruise-missile and ballistic-missile attacks.DDC classification: 358.4/17/0973 Online resources: EBSCOhost Summary: As part of a two-year effort to develop an expansive construct of air and space power in the early twenty-first century that capitalizes on forthcoming air and space technologies and concepts of operation and is effective against adversaries with diverse economies, cultures, political institutions, and military capabilities, the research team investigated the possibility that future adversaries might be able to mount effective missile attacks on U.S. Air Force (USAF) main operating bases in critical regions. This report does not assess the relative vulnerabilities of various force elements and facilities; instead, it aids the USAF in addressing a potential vulnerability of its in-theater bases: highly accurate attacks against USAF aircraft on parking ramps at such bases made possible by the proliferation of Global Positioning System (GPS) guidance and submunition warhead technologies. If such attacks are feasible, the current USAF operational concept of high-tempo, parallel strikes from in-theater bases could be put in jeopardy. This report concludes that these guidance and munition technologies could, in fact, put USAF bases at serious risk. The report describes the threat technologies and concept of operation in detail, then explores both short-term responses--such as putting machine-gun teams equipped with night-vision goggles in towers around the bases--and long-term responses--such as operating anywhere in the world from a few secure, hardened, fixed bases with guaranteed access--to these threats.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
No physical items for this record

Prepared for the U.S. Air Force by Rand's Project Air Force."

"MR-1028-AF."

Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-96).

Description based on print version record.

As part of a two-year effort to develop an expansive construct of air and space power in the early twenty-first century that capitalizes on forthcoming air and space technologies and concepts of operation and is effective against adversaries with diverse economies, cultures, political institutions, and military capabilities, the research team investigated the possibility that future adversaries might be able to mount effective missile attacks on U.S. Air Force (USAF) main operating bases in critical regions. This report does not assess the relative vulnerabilities of various force elements and facilities; instead, it aids the USAF in addressing a potential vulnerability of its in-theater bases: highly accurate attacks against USAF aircraft on parking ramps at such bases made possible by the proliferation of Global Positioning System (GPS) guidance and submunition warhead technologies. If such attacks are feasible, the current USAF operational concept of high-tempo, parallel strikes from in-theater bases could be put in jeopardy. This report concludes that these guidance and munition technologies could, in fact, put USAF bases at serious risk. The report describes the threat technologies and concept of operation in detail, then explores both short-term responses--such as putting machine-gun teams equipped with night-vision goggles in towers around the bases--and long-term responses--such as operating anywhere in the world from a few secure, hardened, fixed bases with guaranteed access--to these threats.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Other editions of this work

Airbase vulnerability to conventional cruise-missile and ballistic-missile attacks by Stillion, John. ©1999
Library, Documentation and Information Science Division, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B T Road, Kolkata 700108, INDIA
Phone no. 91-33-2575 2100, Fax no. 91-33-2578 1412, ksatpathy@isical.ac.in


Visitor Counter